At The Nation, Nancy Goldstein writes, Congress Is Still in the Dark About the Extent of Electronic Snooping:
Here’s the only marginally good news about Congressman Edward Markey’s bombshell revelations last week about government prying into personal cellphone use: the American public and the US Congress now have our very first inkling of the scope of cellphone surveillance requests by law enforcement to telecommunication providers—1.3 million requests for personal data in 2011, according to the telecoms.
The truly bad news, however, is that Congress still has no idea of the scope of law enforcement surveillance. Congress is the body designated to provide oversight of the ways that government peers into our most private affairs. Yet the information that the proactive Markey was able to extract from the telecom providers represents just a fraction of the possible surveillance requests made by law enforcement, a blurry and partial accounting of a field that remains sprawling, unmapped and without rigorous oversight.
The problem begins at the level of Markey’s own worthy but limited investigation. In his capacity as co-chair of the Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus, the Massachusetts Democrat queried nine mobile wireless carriers about their policies and practices for sharing their customers’ mobile phone information with law enforcement agencies. Leaving aside the fact that T-Mobile, one of the largest telecom providers, refused to share its numbers with Markey, the deeper and more troubling problem is that the investigation did not take into account all the law enforcement agencies involved in the snooping business.
The reason: surveillance orders from the National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency are sealed, meaning that telecom providers could only share information on requests from federal, state and local police—or, more specifically, the police, FBI, Secret Service, US marshals, postal inspectors and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It is therefore literally impossible to say how many cellphone data requests would have been tallied if the investigation had included requests to telecom providers by the NSA, CIA and DIA.
No less disturbing, cellphone companies represent only a sliver of the vast landscape of agencies and entities that government routinely taps for personal information. Remember, our data are recorded and archived every time we swipe a card at a subway turnstile, hold up our E-Z Pass at a tollbooth, use our credit or debit cards, interact with any broadband provider, take out a library book, request a disc from Netflix or sign in to Foursquare. But no Congressional body has publicly queried the transportation authorities, the banks or the cable companies, and it was only this week that Senator Al Franken began questioning the FBI and Facebook about their use of facial recognition technologies.
Blast from the Past. At Daily Kos on this date in 2010:
In a campaign cycle where the competition for the most palm-to-face stupid comment by a politician would be a helluva contest, it would seem we can finally declare an undisputed winner.
Observe former Congressman Tim Walberg. Walberg is in the midst of an expensive and competitive primary in Michigan’s 7th district, as he tries to reclaim the seat he lost to Democrat Mark Schauer in 2008. [...]
Consider that in trying to endear himself to the teabagger crowd, Walberg made the following observation:
“With the 9/12 movement, the Tea Party, people are standing up really for the first time in history,” Walberg declared.
Tune in Monday to Friday from 9-11 AM ET for Daily Kos Radio, hosted by David Waldman a/k/a KagroX. You can listen here. It was a tough morning to go on with the show at Daily Kos Radio. We did turn our attention away from the tragedy in Colorado, with DemFromCT bringing us back to ground as usual. Romney’s woes continued to dominate the non-breaking news headlines, and we revisited the great discussion with where4art from Wednesday’s show, and expanded on it by looking at today’s Boston Globe piece, and discussed some new angles on how private equity firms structure themselves such that Romney’s story might make some sense after all. Look for more of that, and maybe a guest or two on the subject, next week.
Source: Daily Kos